# UX review [Experience] **Reviewers**: **Date**: **Designer**: **Spec**: **Designs** ### Status goals #### MVP tied to goals ### Users ### User stories ## UX flow #### Steps Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step ... Precondition: Postcondition: ## Findings | Issue nr | Issue description| Action | Severity | | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | |1 | | | 0 - 4 | ### Actions ... ## Review method #### Sources * https://measuringu.com/pure/ * https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ * https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/?lm=summary-of-usability-inspection-methods&pt=article #### Attention points * Discoverability & Findability * Information (relevant for 80% of users) * Visual hierarchy / Layout * Process / Expectation management * Feed forward (call2action) * Error prevention * Recovery * Modal use * Familiarity * Feedback * Errors and alerts * Navigation (forward & backward) * Extendability * Content vs Controls ##### Severity rating scale 0 = I don't agree that this is a usability problem at all 1 = Cosmetic problem only: need not be fixed unless extra time is available on project 2 = Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority 3 = Major usability problem: important to fix, so should be given high priority 4 = Usability catastrophe: imperative to fix this before product can be released