UX review [Experience]

Reviewers:
Date:
Designer:
Spec:
Designs

Status goals

MVP tied to goals

Users

User stories

UX flow

Steps

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step …

Precondition:
Postcondition:

Findings

Actions

…

Review method

Sources

• https://measuringu.com/pure/
• https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
• https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/?lm=summary-of-usability-inspection-methods&pt=article

Attention points

• Discoverability & Findability
• Information (relevant for 80% of users)
• Visual hierarchy / Layout
• Process / Expectation management
• Feed forward (call2action)
• Error prevention
• Recovery
• Modal use
• Familiarity
• Feedback
• Errors and alerts
• Navigation (forward & backward)
• Extendability
• Content vs Controls

Severity rating scale

0 = I don’t agree that this is a usability problem at all
1 = Cosmetic problem only: need not be fixed unless extra time is available on project
2 = Minor usability problem: fixing this should be given low priority
3 = Major usability problem: important to fix, so should be given high priority
4 = Usability catastrophe: imperative to fix this before product can be released